What happens when local officials invest hundreds of millions and billions of dollars for the "people" when they probably aren't comptent to manage their own retirement account?
CNBC: City Plan Backfires(cache)
Local governments across the country hit on the solution to the underfunding of their generous pension funds a few years ago. They borrowed $64 Billion by issuing “pension obligation bonds.” The idea is simple: borrow money by selling bonds at fixed interest rates and invest the money in something that makes more that you have to pay, like stocks (also called a carry trade). It is like you taking out a loan against your future income (not your home because the local governments have no assets but future tax revenue), then going to Las Vegas to try to make more than you owe. Sounds brilliant, doesn’t it?
If you are Stockton, CA (which is now in bankruptcy) you sell $125 Million of bonds in the Spring of 2007 to play this game. Then, when you lose money and can’t pay it back, you complain that the investment bank that sold the bonds didn’t tell you the risks.
Let me see if I understand. We have people in office who have the power to obligate the tax payers to pay $125 Million in the future that don’t understand that the low interest rates they planned to pay are low because there is little risk to bonds and that interest rates they expected to receive are high exactly because there is risk. Now, when their gamble didn’t pay off, they claim they were duped and somebody else should pay for their “error”.
A few good questions arise from this story: